In today’s rapidly changing AI landscape, a major trend is emerging: simply scaling the volume of data for model training will not be enough to create the next generation of models. There are diminishing returns to adding greater volumes of data towards training large, dense models, and instead, AI development is headed towards a landscape of many models, all of which are finer variations that are well-suited for specific tasks. The curation of an ideal training dataset becomes a multi-constraint optimization problem, where the developer must consider inclusion and exclusion tradeoffs across multiple dimensions of the data to maximize the volume and diversity of information provided to the model. This, then, poses a question of how to evaluate whether a training dataset is appropriate for such specific model development.
Share this post
A Rubric for Evaluating Healthcare AI…
Share this post
In today’s rapidly changing AI landscape, a major trend is emerging: simply scaling the volume of data for model training will not be enough to create the next generation of models. There are diminishing returns to adding greater volumes of data towards training large, dense models, and instead, AI development is headed towards a landscape of many models, all of which are finer variations that are well-suited for specific tasks. The curation of an ideal training dataset becomes a multi-constraint optimization problem, where the developer must consider inclusion and exclusion tradeoffs across multiple dimensions of the data to maximize the volume and diversity of information provided to the model. This, then, poses a question of how to evaluate whether a training dataset is appropriate for such specific model development.